reports:report_2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
reports:report_2 [2021/02/18 18:53] – [Features] luisa | reports:report_2 [2025/04/29 15:16] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== From World Housing Encyclopedia === | === From World Housing Encyclopedia === | ||
- | + | {{ : | |
- | {{ : | + | |
---- | ---- | ||
- | ==== General Information ==== | + | ==== 1. General Information ==== |
**Report:** 2 | **Report:** 2 | ||
Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | ==== Features ==== | + | ==== 2. Features ==== |
- | {{gallery> | + | {{gallery>: |
**Plan Shape:** Rectangular, | **Plan Shape:** Rectangular, | ||
Line 81: | Line 80: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | ==== Building Materials and Construction Process ==== | + | ==== 3. Building Materials and Construction Process ==== |
+ | |||
+ | === Description of Building Materials === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Structural Element ^ Building Material (s) ^ Comment (s) ^ | ||
+ | | Wall/Frame | Wall: Adobe blocks/ Reinforced concrete Frame: Reinforced concrete | Wall- Characteristic Strength: 3 Kg/sq cm - 10 Kg/sq cm Mix Proportion/ | ||
+ | | Foundations | Concrete with stone | Characteristic Strength: 150 kg/ cm2 Mix Proportion/ | ||
+ | | Floors | | | | ||
+ | | Roof | Round logs with cane and mud roof |Round log d=16 cm, every 60 cm Roof maximum weight: 150 kg/ m2 | | ||
+ | | Other | | | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Design Process === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who is involved with the design process?** Other | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Roles of those involved in the design process:** In the beginning, this type of construction was designed and built by engineers and general builders, but later the same construction began to be made by the owners. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Construction Process === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who typically builds this construction type?** OwnerOther | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Roles of those involved in the building process:** When this construction was first used, the builder did not live in this construction type. However, later on it was built by the owners themselves; in general, owners of this type of construction are people without any chances of building their houses with other building materials (due to their high cost). | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Expertise of those involved in building process:** This construction began to be practiced after the 1944 earthquake, as an alternative to improve the seismic behavior of the traditional adobe block construction. The design of adobe construction was largely based on the local building experience related to this kind of construction. This experience and the new information gained after the earthquake helped in improving the adobe construction practice. This construction proved to be an economic solution as the local material and skills were used and the traditional construction practice was followed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Construction process and phasing:** The owner of the house usually carries out the construction. It begins with the manufacturing of adobe, the filling in of foundations and plinth construction. After that, the adobe block masonry is built, caring that the blocks are perfectly joined. Then, the frame of the top reinforcement concrete beam is made, and the iron bars are placed to fasten the round logs of the roof. The frame is filled in with concrete. The round logs are placed and fastened every 60 cm. After that a 5cm-wide coat of cane and mud is placed. This coat is later made waterproof with asphalt, finishing the process with the placement of Spanish tiles. The tools and equipment typically used are: wheelbarrows, | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Codes and Standards === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is this construction type address by codes/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Applicable codes or standards: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Process for building code enforcement: | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Permits and Development Control Rules === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Are building permits required?** Yes | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is this typically informal construction? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules?** No | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:** This construction is subject to regulations and the approval of plans. | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Maintenance and Condition === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who typically maintains buildings of this type?** Owner(s) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on maintenance and building condition: | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Construction Economics === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Unit construction cost:** Unit construction cost per m2 of built-up area is approximately US$ 137. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Labor requirements: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 4. Socio-Economic Issues ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Patterns of occupancy: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the day:** <5 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the evening/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Economic level of inhabitants: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on economic level of inhabitants: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical Source of Financing: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on financing: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Type of Ownership: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on ownership: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **What does earthquake insurance typically cover/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Are premium discounts or higher coverages available for seismically strengthened buildings or new buildings built to incorporate seismically resistant features?** No | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 5. Earthquakes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{gallery>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Past Earthquakes in the country which affected buildings of this type:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Year ^ Earthquake Epicenter ^ Richter Magnitude | ||
+ | | 1977 | Caucete 100 km to the east of San Juan Capital cit | 7.4 | IX MMI | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Past Earthquakes === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type:** In general, during the 1977 earthquake, the adobe block construction built in Caucete using the standards of 1948, suffered moderate damage (economically repairable); | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on earthquake damage patterns:** In the Capital city of San Juan, located at approximately 100 km distance from the epicenter, the intensity was between VII MMI and VIII MMI . It is important to mention that a wide area of about 1000 km2 experienced liquefaction. | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Structural and Architectural Features for Seismic Resistance === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 “Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard”, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^Structural/ | ||
+ | | Lateral load path | The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation. | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Building Configuration-Vertical | The building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1) | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Building Configuration-Horizontal | The building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2) | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Roof Construction | The roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Floor Construction | The floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Foundation Performance | There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Wall and Frame Structures-Redundancy | The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Wall Proportions | Height-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls); | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Foundation-Wall Connection | Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; | ||
+ | | Wall-Roof Connections | Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Wall Openings | | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Quality of Building Materials | Quality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate). | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Quality of Workmanship | Quality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards). | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Maintenance | Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber). | FALSE | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Irregularities === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type:** Other | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type:** Other | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in walls:** The resistance of adobe masonry in this construction type is weakened by the following factors: 1. The openings- due to the following factors:a) the big size of the two windows (1.60 m2) in the main face of the construction. b) The position of the doors in the angles formed by the meeting of walls. c) The great percentage of opening surface (31%) in the front and back walls. 2- The vulnerability of the adobe due to humidity | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in frames:** No buttresses provided at the wall intersections. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in roof and floors:** The roof is flexible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Seismic Vulnerability Rating === | ||
+ | |||
+ | For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | A | B | C | D | E | F | | ||
+ | | Seismic vulnerability class | %%|-%% | o | %%-|%% | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 6. Retrofit Information ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Structural Deficiency ^ Seismic Strengthening ^ | ||
+ | | Additional comments on seismic strengthening provisions | This type of construction has emerged as a proposal to strengthen the traditional adobe block construction which had an unsatisfactory performance during the 1944 earthquake. This construction has been built in San Juan under the Adobe Construction Regulations of 1948, however it is only allowed in rural areas. During the 1977 Caucete earthquake, this construction has a satisfactory performance so no seismic strengthening has been done since that time. It should be noted that some traditional adobe construction (not following the 1948 Regulations) is still being practiced in rural areas. | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 7. References ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Adobe Construction Regulations | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The 1951 Building Code of the Province of San Juan | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Adobe Block Housing in Dry Areas Hugo Giuliani and Jose Herrera Cano | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 1991 National Survey on Population and Housing (INDEC) N18 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Inter-relations Between Architectural Design and Structural Design in High Seismic Risk Areas : Building Level - San Juan San Juan, Argentina 1989 | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Authors === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Name ^ Title ^ Affiliation ^ Location ^ | ||
+ | | Virginia I Rodriguez | Architect | Professor-Researcher | B# UDAP III M.EMblock 1 Piso 1# 5425 San Juan-Argentina | | ||
+ | | Maria I Yacante | Architect | Researcher | Av. Libertador 1068 (s) 5400 San Juan-Argentina | | ||
+ | | Sergio Reiloba | Architect | Researcher | 5400 San Juan - Argentina | | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Reviewers | ||
- | * __**Description | + | ^ Name ^ Title ^ Affiliation ^ Location ^ |
+ | | Sergio Alcocer | Director | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | </tr> | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | </tr> | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | </tr> | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | </td> | ||
- | < | ||
- | kg/sq. cm. The mix proportion used in making the concrete is 1:2:4 (cement-sandpebble).</ | ||
- | </tr> | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | kg/sq. cm. The mix proportion used in making the concrete is 1:2:4 (cement-sandpebble). The size of columns is 0.20 m x 0.20 m and that of beams is 0.20 m x 0.15 m.</ | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | </ | ||
- | </ |
reports/report_2.1613674438.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/04/29 15:16 (external edit)